HKTVY
Price
$4.25
Change
+$0.09 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
161.75M
MRCIF
Price
$15.88
Change
-$1.12 (-6.59%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKTVY vs MRCIF

Header iconHKTVY vs MRCIF Comparison
Open Charts HKTVY vs MRCIFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Technology Venture
Price$4.25
Change+$0.09 (+2.16%)
Volume$455
Capitalization161.75M
Mercari
Price$15.88
Change-$1.12 (-6.59%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.64B
HKTVY vs MRCIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKTVY vs. MRCIF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKTVY is a Hold and MRCIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (HKTVY: $4.25 vs. MRCIF: $15.88)
Brand notoriety: HKTVY and MRCIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKTVY: 65% vs. MRCIF: 190%
Market capitalization -- HKTVY: $161.73M vs. MRCIF: $2.64B
HKTVY [@Internet Retail] is valued at $161.73M. MRCIF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $2.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.4T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $47.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKTVY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HKTVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKTVY is a better buy in the long-term than MRCIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKTVY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCIF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKTVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRCIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKTVY is a better buy in the short-term than MRCIF.

Price Growth

HKTVY (@Internet Retail) experienced а +9.25% price change this week, while MRCIF (@Internet Retail) price change was -6.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +113.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.20% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRCIF($2.64B) has a higher market cap than HKTVY($162M). HKTVY has higher P/E ratio than MRCIF: HKTVY (32.42) vs MRCIF (24.20). HKTVY YTD gains are higher at: 120.478 vs. MRCIF (28.948).
HKTVYMRCIFHKTVY / MRCIF
Capitalization162M2.64B6%
EBITDAN/A24.9B-
Gain YTD120.47828.948416%
P/E Ratio32.4224.20134%
RevenueN/A189B-
Total CashN/A193B-
Total DebtN/A179B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKTVY: Fundamental Ratings
HKTVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKTVYMRCIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVVYX24.57-0.01
-0.04%
Macquarie International Core Eq Y
APAYX10.93-0.01
-0.09%
Integrity Dividend Summit A
NMIEX13.10-0.02
-0.15%
Northern Active M International Equity
VASVX28.19-0.07
-0.25%
Vanguard Selected Value Inv
TVSVX19.01-0.17
-0.89%
Third Avenue Small Cap Value Investor

HKTVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKTVY and TDUP have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKTVY and TDUP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKTVY
1D Price
Change %
HKTVY100%
N/A
TDUP - HKTVY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
MPNGY - HKTVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
MPNGF - HKTVY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
MRCIF - HKTVY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCARY - HKTVY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

MRCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRCIF and NEXCF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRCIF and NEXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCIF
1D Price
Change %
MRCIF100%
N/A
NEXCF - MRCIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
MCARY - MRCIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
HKTVY - MRCIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPNGY - MRCIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
KGGNF - MRCIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More