HKTVY
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.55 (-13.58%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
159.73M
MPNGF
Price
$16.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
100.67B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKTVY vs MPNGF

Header iconHKTVY vs MPNGF Comparison
Open Charts HKTVY vs MPNGFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Technology Venture
Price$3.50
Change-$0.55 (-13.58%)
Volume$571
Capitalization159.73M
MEITUAN
Price$16.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$687
Capitalization100.67B
HKTVY vs MPNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKTVY vs. MPNGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKTVY is a Hold and MPNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HKTVY: $3.50 vs. MPNGF: $16.58)
Brand notoriety: HKTVY and MPNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKTVY: 72% vs. MPNGF: 18%
Market capitalization -- HKTVY: $159.73M vs. MPNGF: $100.67B
HKTVY [@Internet Retail] is valued at $159.73M. MPNGF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $100.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.37T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $46.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKTVY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKTVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKTVY is a better buy in the long-term than MPNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKTVY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPNGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKTVY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPNGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPNGF is a better buy in the short-term than HKTVY.

Price Growth

HKTVY (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MPNGF (@Internet Retail) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPNGF is expected to report earnings on Aug 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.75% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPNGF($101B) has a higher market cap than HKTVY($160M). HKTVY has higher P/E ratio than MPNGF: HKTVY (32.42) vs MPNGF (21.02). HKTVY YTD gains are higher at: 81.570 vs. MPNGF (-15.083).
HKTVYMPNGFHKTVY / MPNGF
Capitalization160M101B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD81.570-15.083-541%
P/E Ratio32.4221.02154%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKTVY vs MPNGF: Fundamental Ratings
HKTVY
MPNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
8788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKTVY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPNGF (85). This means that HKTVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MPNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HKTVY (100). This means that MPNGF’s stock grew similarly to HKTVY’s over the last 12 months.

HKTVY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MPNGF (88). This means that HKTVY’s stock grew similarly to MPNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HKTVY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MPNGF (62). This means that HKTVY’s stock grew similarly to MPNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HKTVY's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPNGF (97). This means that HKTVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKTVYMPNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKTVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSCO19.320.41
+2.17%
Victoria's Secret & Co
W51.220.56
+1.11%
Wayfair
EMCGU12.11N/A
N/A
Embrace Change Acquisition Corp
KMDA7.71-0.19
-2.41%
Kamada Ltd
NRSN1.90-0.08
-4.04%
NeuroSense Therapeutics Ltd

HKTVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKTVY and TDUP have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKTVY and TDUP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKTVY
1D Price
Change %
HKTVY100%
N/A
TDUP - HKTVY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
MPNGY - HKTVY
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
MPNGF - HKTVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCIF - HKTVY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCARY - HKTVY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More

MPNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPNGF has been closely correlated with MPNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPNGF jumps, then MPNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPNGF
1D Price
Change %
MPNGF100%
N/A
MPNGY - MPNGF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
BABAF - MPNGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
JDCMF - MPNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXCF - MPNGF
13%
Poorly correlated
+38.87%
MCARY - MPNGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More