HKSHF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.13 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
KCKSF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.04 (+15.38%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
103.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKSHF vs KCKSF

Header iconHKSHF vs KCKSF Comparison
Open Charts HKSHF vs KCKSFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong & Shanghai Hotels
Price$0.65
Change-$0.13 (-16.67%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.47B
Keck Seng Investments
Price$0.30
Change+$0.04 (+15.38%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization103.84M
HKSHF vs KCKSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKSHF vs. KCKSF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKSHF is a Hold and KCKSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HKSHF: $0.65 vs. KCKSF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: HKSHF and KCKSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKSHF: 35% vs. KCKSF: 252%
Market capitalization -- HKSHF: $1.47B vs. KCKSF: $103.84M
HKSHF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $1.47B. KCKSF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $103.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKCKSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KCKSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCKSF is a better buy in the long-term than HKSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCKSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KCKSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HKSHF and KCKSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HKSHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KCKSF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+4.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKSHF($1.47B) has a higher market cap than KCKSF($104M). HKSHF has higher P/E ratio than KCKSF: HKSHF (27.62) vs KCKSF (9.40). KCKSF YTD gains are higher at: 15.565 vs. HKSHF (-20.435). HKSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 877M vs. KCKSF (-55.36M). KCKSF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. HKSHF (657M). KCKSF has less debt than HKSHF: KCKSF (1.6B) vs HKSHF (16.6B). HKSHF has higher revenues than KCKSF: HKSHF (3.86B) vs KCKSF (483M).
HKSHFKCKSFHKSHF / KCKSF
Capitalization1.47B104M1,413%
EBITDA877M-55.36M-1,584%
Gain YTD-20.43515.565-131%
P/E Ratio27.629.40294%
Revenue3.86B483M799%
Total Cash657M1.19B55%
Total Debt16.6B1.6B1,038%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKSHF vs KCKSF: Fundamental Ratings
HKSHF
KCKSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KCKSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKSHF (69). This means that KCKSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKSHF’s over the last 12 months.

KCKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HKSHF (100). This means that KCKSF’s stock grew similarly to HKSHF’s over the last 12 months.

HKSHF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as KCKSF (92). This means that HKSHF’s stock grew similarly to KCKSF’s over the last 12 months.

KCKSF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKSHF (85). This means that KCKSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKSHF’s over the last 12 months.

HKSHF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as KCKSF (78). This means that HKSHF’s stock grew similarly to KCKSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKSHFKCKSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRZPX26.990.26
+0.97%
T. Rowe Price European Stock Z
MXINX14.910.13
+0.88%
Empower International Index Inv
LZUOX17.160.08
+0.47%
Lazard US Equity Focus Open
PAMCX94.600.31
+0.33%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
WASMX24.330.06
+0.25%
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap

HKSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKSHF and DLTTF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKSHF and DLTTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKSHF
1D Price
Change %
HKSHF100%
N/A
DLTTF - HKSHF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACCYY - HKSHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
ACRFF - HKSHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCKSF - HKSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNOIY - HKSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KCKSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KCKSF and ACCYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KCKSF and ACCYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCKSF
1D Price
Change %
KCKSF100%
N/A
ACCYY - KCKSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
MAORF - KCKSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
HKSHF - KCKSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNILY - KCKSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNOIY - KCKSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More