Advertisement
HKD vs LIFX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKD is a Hold and LIFX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HKD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIFX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HKD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFX’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HKD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- LIFX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
HKD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while LIFX (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HKD | LIFX | HKD / LIFX | |
| Capitalization | 503M | 7.25B | 7% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 16.3M | - |
| Gain YTD | -45.946 | 107.352 | -43% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.90 | 207.10 | 3% |
| Revenue | N/A | 427M | - |
| Total Cash | 154M | 433M | 36% |
| Total Debt | 120M | 309M | 39% |
| HKD | LIFX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTA | 9.29 | 0.17 | +1.86% |
| Blackrock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust | |||
| DWX | 43.07 | 0.27 | +0.63% |
| SPDR® S&P® International Dividend ETF | |||
| EVHY | 53.41 | 0.09 | +0.18% |
| Eaton Vance High Yield ETF | |||
| ONEZ | 25.97 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buf ETF | |||
| DFLV | 32.43 | -0.13 | -0.40% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
HKD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKD has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKD jumps, then AI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKD | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| AI - HKD | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| ONTF - HKD | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| VEEV - HKD | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| TUYA - HKD | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| APPS - HKD | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.19% | ||
More | ||||
LIFX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIFX and TLS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIFX and TLS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIFX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFX | 100% | N/A | ||
| TLS - LIFX | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.57% | ||
| ABANF - LIFX | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCCS - LIFX | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
| DH - LIFX | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| HKD - LIFX | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||