HKCVF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
KYSEY
Price
$8.29
Change
-$0.28 (-3.27%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKCVF vs KYSEY

Header iconHKCVF vs KYSEY Comparison
Open Charts HKCVF vs KYSEYBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments
Price$0.67
Change+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Volume$6.41K
Capitalization5.5B
Kyushu Electric Power
Price$8.29
Change-$0.28 (-3.27%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization3.25B
HKCVF vs KYSEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KYSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKCVF vs. KYSEY commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKCVF is a Hold and KYSEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (HKCVF: $0.67 vs. KYSEY: $8.29)
Brand notoriety: HKCVF and KYSEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKCVF: 100% vs. KYSEY: 188%
Market capitalization -- HKCVF: $5.5B vs. KYSEY: $3.25B
HKCVF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $5.5B. KYSEY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $3.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKYSEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKCVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KYSEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKCVF is a better buy in the long-term than KYSEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KYSEY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KYSEY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HKCVF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KYSEY (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.83% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKCVF($5.5B) has a higher market cap than KYSEY($3.25B). KYSEY has higher P/E ratio than HKCVF: KYSEY (85.47) vs HKCVF (13.93). HKCVF YTD gains are higher at: 8.126 vs. KYSEY (-17.512). HKCVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.71B vs. KYSEY (-125.72B). KYSEY has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. HKCVF (55M). HKCVF has less debt than KYSEY: HKCVF (49.7B) vs KYSEY (3.67T). KYSEY has higher revenues than HKCVF: KYSEY (2.11T) vs HKCVF (11B).
HKCVFKYSEYHKCVF / KYSEY
Capitalization5.5B3.25B169%
EBITDA7.71B-125.72B-6%
Gain YTD8.126-17.512-46%
P/E Ratio13.9385.4716%
Revenue11B2.11T1%
Total Cash55M266B0%
Total Debt49.7B3.67T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKCVF vs KYSEY: Fundamental Ratings
HKCVF
KYSEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
81100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKCVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as KYSEY (55). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to KYSEY’s over the last 12 months.

KYSEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (100). This means that KYSEY’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as KYSEY (100). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to KYSEY’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as KYSEY (79). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to KYSEY’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as KYSEY (62). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to KYSEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKCVFKYSEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KYSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIRRX9.530.07
+0.74%
Lord Abbett International Value R3
LFGCX37.090.11
+0.30%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
EURCHF0.940.00
+0.01%
Euro - Switzerland Franc
USDCNY7.17N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - China Yuan
HKDCHF0.10-0.00
-0.07%
Hong Kong Dollar - Switzerland Franc

HKCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKCVF and HGKGY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKCVF and HGKGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKCVF
1D Price
Change %
HKCVF100%
N/A
HGKGY - HKCVF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
HUNGF - HKCVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IESFY - HKCVF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
HPIFY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKVTY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KYSEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KYSEY and IBDSF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KYSEY and IBDSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KYSEY
1D Price
Change %
KYSEY100%
N/A
IBDSF - KYSEY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
IBDRY - KYSEY
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
HGKGY - KYSEY
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
HKCVF - KYSEY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPIFY - KYSEY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More