Advertisement
HKBNF vs TCPFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKBNF is a Hold and TCPFF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKBNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HKBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TCPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
HKBNF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCPFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.83%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.63% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| HKBNF | TCPFF | HKBNF / TCPFF | |
| Capitalization | 1.2B | 12.1B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 2.14B | 86.7B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 250.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.7B | 201B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 20.1B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 11.5B | 446B | 3% |
HKBNF | TCPFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HKBNF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCPFF (65). This means that HKBNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCPFF’s over the last 12 months.
TCPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKBNF (100). This means that TCPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HKBNF’s over the last 12 months.
TCPFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as HKBNF (99). This means that TCPFF’s stock grew similarly to HKBNF’s over the last 12 months.
TCPFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HKBNF (69). This means that TCPFF’s stock grew similarly to HKBNF’s over the last 12 months.
HKBNF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCPFF (100). This means that HKBNF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCPFF’s over the last 12 months.
| HKBNF | TCPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 0% | 2 days ago 25% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DWAW | 44.69 | 0.17 | +0.38% |
| AdvisorShares DW FSM All Cap World ETF | |||
| EWV | 25.16 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | |||
| SRVR | 29.15 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Pacer Benchmark Data&Infras RE SCTR ETF | |||
| MHNC | 15.75 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd | |||
| STEW | 18.43 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
| SRH Total Return Fund | |||
HKBNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKBNF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKBNF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKBNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKBNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KORE - HKBNF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| AAFRF - HKBNF | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.95% | ||
| HTWSF - HKBNF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - HKBNF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CUCSF - HKBNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TCPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCPFF has been loosely correlated with NETLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCPFF jumps, then NETLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NETLF - TCPFF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVIFY - TCPFF | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
| MACT - TCPFF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| IHS - TCPFF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| HKBNF - TCPFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||