Advertisement
HKBNF vs NETLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKBNF is a Hold and NETLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKBNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNETLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HKBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NETLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
HKBNF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NETLF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.79%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.72% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| HKBNF | NETLF | HKBNF / NETLF | |
| Capitalization | 1.28B | 2.91B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 2.14B | 296M | 722% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 39.38 | - |
| Revenue | 10.7B | 409M | 2,616% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 256M | 475% |
| Total Debt | 11.5B | 1.02B | 1,125% |
HKBNF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NETLF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPDV | 36.09 | 0.18 | +0.50% |
| AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | |||
| EFR | 11.34 | 0.04 | +0.35% |
| Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund | |||
| HECO | 45.49 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR Galaxy Hdg Dgtl Ast Ecosystem ETF | |||
| SPMV | 51.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | |||
| IWL | 172.85 | -0.52 | -0.30% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | |||
HKBNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKBNF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKBNF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKBNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKBNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KORE - HKBNF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| AAFRF - HKBNF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| HTWSF - HKBNF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| IHS - HKBNF | 2% Poorly correlated | +5.79% | ||
| CUCSF - HKBNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NETLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETLF has been loosely correlated with TCPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETLF jumps, then TCPFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NETLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCPFF - NETLF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MACT - NETLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - NETLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +5.79% | ||
| AAFRF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| HKBNF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||