HIVE
Price
$2.31
Change
+$0.06 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
311.67M
SWIN
Price
$3.84
Change
+$0.27 (+7.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
87.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIVE vs SWIN

Header iconHIVE vs SWIN Comparison
Open Charts HIVE vs SWINBanner chart's image
HIVE Digital Technologies
Price$2.31
Change+$0.06 (+2.67%)
Volume$23.33M
Capitalization311.67M
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
Price$3.84
Change+$0.27 (+7.56%)
Volume$232.49K
Capitalization87.08M
HIVE vs SWIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIVE vs. SWIN commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIVE is a StrongBuy and SWIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HIVE: $2.31 vs. SWIN: $3.84)
Brand notoriety: HIVE and SWIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIVE: 138% vs. SWIN: 108%
Market capitalization -- HIVE: $311.67M vs. SWIN: $87.08M
HIVE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $311.67M. SWIN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $87.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HIVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HIVE and SWIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIVE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIVE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWIN is a better buy in the short-term than HIVE.

Price Growth

HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +29.05% price change this week, while SWIN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +25.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIVE($312M) has a higher market cap than SWIN($87.1M). SWIN has higher P/E ratio than HIVE: SWIN (67.46) vs HIVE (6.72). SWIN YTD gains are higher at: 132.727 vs. HIVE (-18.947).
HIVESWINHIVE / SWIN
Capitalization312M87.1M358%
EBITDA29.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.947132.727-14%
P/E Ratio6.7267.4610%
Revenue121MN/A-
Total Cash24.7MN/A-
Total Debt32.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIVE: Fundamental Ratings
HIVE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIVESWIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANCTF50.800.55
+1.09%
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
HHLKF0.40N/A
N/A
Hot Chili Ltd.
KMERF35.55N/A
N/A
Komercni Banka A.S.
ROWKF0.24N/A
N/A
Renoworks Software, Inc.
IPHLF4.42N/A
N/A
IPH LTD.

HIVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIVE has been closely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIVE jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIVE
1D Price
Change %
HIVE100%
+2.67%
BITF - HIVE
86%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
CLSK - HIVE
82%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
RIOT - HIVE
82%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
HUT - HIVE
81%
Closely correlated
+3.89%
BTBT - HIVE
76%
Closely correlated
+27.27%
More

SWIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWIN and TOP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWIN and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWIN
1D Price
Change %
SWIN100%
+7.56%
TOP - SWIN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
HIVE - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
FUTU - SWIN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
DEFT - SWIN
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
SIEB - SWIN
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More