HIVE
Price
$1.86
Change
-$0.05 (-2.62%)
Updated
May 15, 02:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
311.67M
MATH
Price
$2.43
Change
-$0.19 (-7.25%)
Updated
May 15, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.42M
Ad is loading...

HIVE vs MATH

Header iconHIVE vs MATH Comparison
Open Charts HIVE vs MATHBanner chart's image
HIVE Digital Technologies
Price$1.86
Change-$0.05 (-2.62%)
Volume$7.28K
Capitalization311.67M
Metalpha Technology Holding
Price$2.43
Change-$0.19 (-7.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.42M
HIVE vs MATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIVE vs. MATH commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIVE is a Buy and MATH is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HIVE: $1.91 vs. MATH: $2.62)
Brand notoriety: HIVE and MATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIVE: 130% vs. MATH: 927%
Market capitalization -- HIVE: $311.67M vs. MATH: $55.42M
HIVE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $311.67M. MATH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HIVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the long-term than HIVE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIVE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIVE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the short-term than HIVE.

Price Growth

HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +10.40% price change this week, while MATH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +36.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +124.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIVE is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2023.

MATH is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.42% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIVE($312M) has a higher market cap than MATH($55.4M). MATH YTD gains are higher at: 127.826 vs. HIVE (-32.982).
HIVEMATHHIVE / MATH
Capitalization312M55.4M563%
EBITDA29.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-32.982127.826-26%
P/E Ratio6.72N/A-
Revenue121MN/A-
Total Cash24.7MN/A-
Total Debt32.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIVE vs MATH: Fundamental Ratings
HIVE
MATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2231
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HIVE's Valuation (58) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as MATH (64) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to MATH’s over the last 12 months.

HIVE's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as MATH (100) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to MATH’s over the last 12 months.

HIVE's SMR Rating (91) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as MATH (100) in the null industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to MATH’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HIVE (60) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIVE (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that MATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIVEMATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA347.6813.61
+4.07%
Tesla
GME28.730.34
+1.20%
GameStop Corp
SPY587.590.75
+0.13%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL212.33-0.60
-0.28%
Apple
BTC.X103539.414000-630.398440
-0.61%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

HIVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIVE has been closely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIVE jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIVE
1D Price
Change %
HIVE100%
-2.55%
BITF - HIVE
85%
Closely correlated
-6.03%
CLSK - HIVE
83%
Closely correlated
-3.90%
RIOT - HIVE
82%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
HUT - HIVE
82%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
COIN - HIVE
77%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
More

MATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MATH and HOOD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATH and HOOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATH
1D Price
Change %
MATH100%
+2.91%
HOOD - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
HIVE - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
CLSK - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
COIN - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
ARBK - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.52%
More