Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIPS vs NTSX
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison
Open Charts HIPS vs NTSX
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
Price$12.23
Change-$0.07 (-0.57%)
Volume$31.98K
Net Assets116.8M
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Price$52.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$44.01K
Net Assets1.24B
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIPS vs. NTSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPS is a Buy and NTSX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSX has more net assets: 1.24B vs. HIPS (117M). NTSX has a higher annual dividend yield than HIPS: NTSX (13.244) vs HIPS (1.965). HIPS was incepted earlier than NTSX: HIPS (11 years) vs NTSX (7 years). NTSX (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than HIPS (1.60). HIPS has a higher turnover NTSX (5.00) vs NTSX (5.00).
| HIPS | NTSX | HIPS / NTSX | |
| Gain YTD | 1.965 | 13.244 | 15% |
| Net Assets | 117M | 1.24B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.20 | 800% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 5.00 | 860% |
| Yield | 10.57 | 1.13 | 933% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HIPS | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPS has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIPS jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| MFIC - HIPS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ARCC - HIPS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| FDUS - HIPS | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BXSL - HIPS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| GBDC - HIPS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
NTSX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSX has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSX jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTSX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTSX | 100% | N/A | ||
| AAPL - NTSX | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AMZN - NTSX | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - NTSX | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| META - NTSX | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| NVDA - NTSX | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.70% |