Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIPS vs NTSX
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison
Open Charts HIPS vs NTSX
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
Price$12.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$3.81K
Net Assets113.71M
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Price$51.51
Change-$0.55 (-1.06%)
Volume$85.94K
Net Assets1.25B
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIPS vs. NTSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPS is a Hold and NTSX is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSX has more net assets: 1.25B vs. HIPS (114M). NTSX has a higher annual dividend yield than HIPS: NTSX (10.981) vs HIPS (0.853). HIPS was incepted earlier than NTSX: HIPS (11 years) vs NTSX (7 years). NTSX (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than HIPS (1.60). HIPS has a higher turnover NTSX (5.00) vs NTSX (5.00).
| HIPS | NTSX | HIPS / NTSX | |
| Gain YTD | 0.853 | 10.981 | 8% |
| Net Assets | 114M | 1.25B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.20 | 800% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 5.00 | 860% |
| Yield | 10.63 | 1.16 | 918% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HIPS | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 67% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLOCX | 8.76 | 0.07 | +0.81% |
| Cohen & Steers Future of Energy C | |||
| WGIFX | 72.65 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F2 | |||
| SLGFX | 21.65 | -0.05 | -0.23% |
| SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT) | |||
| GCTRX | 50.64 | -0.12 | -0.24% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6 | |||
| GTLOX | 20.98 | -0.06 | -0.29% |
| Glenmede Disciplined US Eq Ptf | |||
HIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPS has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIPS jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPS | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| MFIC - HIPS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ARCC - HIPS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| FDUS - HIPS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| GBDC - HIPS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| BXSL - HIPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More | ||||
NTSX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSX has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSX jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTSX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTSX | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| AAPL - NTSX | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| AMZN - NTSX | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| MSFT - NTSX | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| META - NTSX | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| NVDA - NTSX | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.86% |