Advertisement
HIPS vs MFIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPS is a Buy and MFIC is a StrongBuy.
MFIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIPS | MFIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 67% | 22 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSWCX | 13.57 | 0.15 | +1.12% |
| Fidelity SAI US Value Index | |||
| PQCCX | 10.16 | 0.07 | +0.69% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Index R6 | |||
| SBICX | 10.69 | 0.04 | +0.38% |
| ClearBridge International Value C | |||
| KTRAX | 9.79 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
| DWS Global Income Builder A | |||
| FCHKX | 50.54 | -0.12 | -0.24% |
| Fidelity Advisor China Region C | |||
HIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPS has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIPS jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPS | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| GSBD - HIPS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| FDUS - HIPS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| MFIC - HIPS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| BXSL - HIPS | 76% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| ARCC - HIPS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||
MFIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with GBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then GBDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFIC | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| GBDC - MFIC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| SLRC - MFIC | 82% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| GSBD - MFIC | 81% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| ARCC - MFIC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| OBDC - MFIC | 80% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||