Advertisement
HIPO vs TRRSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPO is a Hold and TRRSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIPO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRRSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +6.83% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.66% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Specialty Insurance (+1.01% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| HIPO | TRRSF | HIPO / TRRSF | |
| Capitalization | 771M | 1.44B | 54% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.054 | 10.147 | 148% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.53 | - |
| Revenue | 397M | 773M | 51% |
| Total Cash | 393M | 1.44B | 27% |
| Total Debt | 8.9M | 107M | 8% |
TRRSF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIPO | TRRSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JDCRX | 48.60 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Janus Henderson Forty R | |||
| PADEX | 22.86 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5 | |||
| BCAMX | 74.91 | -0.08 | -0.11% |
| Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity | |||
| NBHCX | 14.59 | -0.03 | -0.21% |
| Neuberger Berman Equity Income C | |||
| MDVYX | 10.42 | -0.05 | -0.48% |
| MassMutual Diversified Value Svc | |||
HIPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPO | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| LMND - HIPO | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| ROOT - HIPO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| FNF - HIPO | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| ORI - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TRUP - HIPO | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
TRRSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRRSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRRSF | 100% | -2.19% | ||
| BZLYF - TRRSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| JTGPF - TRRSF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACMT - TRRSF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HIPO - TRRSF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| RYAN - TRRSF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||