Advertisement
HIPO vs LMND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPO is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMND’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LMND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
LMND is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.47% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| HIPO | LMND | HIPO / LMND | |
| Capitalization | 772M | 6.06B | 13% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.297 | 13.993 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.08 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 450M | 659M | 68% |
| Total Cash | 521M | 587M | 89% |
| Total Debt | 53.2M | 152M | 35% |
| HIPO | LMND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FWCBX | 78.39 | 0.31 | +0.40% |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F3 | |||
| BLNIX | 13.98 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| Meeder Balanced Institutional | |||
| IHOAX | 22.45 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
| Hartford International Opportunities A | |||
| HEORX | 18.48 | -0.05 | -0.27% |
| Hartford Climate Opportunities R3 | |||
| UOPSX | 79.80 | -1.75 | -2.15% |
| ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Svc | |||
HIPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPO | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| LMND - HIPO | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| AIZ - HIPO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| ROOT - HIPO | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FNF - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| MKL - HIPO | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| ROOT - LMND | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| HIPO - LMND | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| UFCS - LMND | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| BNT - LMND | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| TRUP - LMND | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
More | ||||