Advertisement
HIMS vs IPAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMS is a Hold and IPAR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPAR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HIMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IPAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- IPAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HIMS (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -11.40% price change this week, while IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
HIMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
IPAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.07% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| HIMS | IPAR | HIMS / IPAR | |
| Capitalization | 10.4B | 3.62B | 287% |
| EBITDA | 132M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 90.323 | -13.182 | -685% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.25 | 22.47 | 259% |
| Revenue | 1.78B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 323M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 63.4M | 184M | 34% |
HIMS | IPAR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPAR's Valuation (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for HIMS (95) in the null industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew significantly faster than HIMS’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as HIMS (50) in the null industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to HIMS’s over the last 12 months.
HIMS's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as IPAR (42) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HIMS’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
HIMS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPAR (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HIMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as HIMS (98) in the null industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to HIMS’s over the last 12 months.
| HIMS | IPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QDCC | 24.35 | 0.10 | +0.40% |
| Global X S&P 500 Qual Div Cov Cll ETF | |||
| EAPR | 28.54 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Innovator Em Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF - Apr | |||
| LRND | 37.29 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| QUS | 165.68 | -0.02 | -0.01% |
| SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | |||
| XBB | 40.97 | N/A | -0.01% |
| BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
HIMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HIMS and EWCZ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIMS and EWCZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| EWCZ - HIMS | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| IPAR - HIMS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| HNST - HIMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| SPB - HIMS | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| ACU - HIMS | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.86% | ||
More | ||||
IPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAR has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAR jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| COTY - IPAR | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| EL - IPAR | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| ELF - IPAR | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| SPB - IPAR | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| HNST - IPAR | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
More | ||||