Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIMDX vs NAESX
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HIMDX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Instl
Price$23.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMDX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HIMDX (1.35B). NAESX pays higher dividends than HIMDX: NAESX (1.28) vs HIMDX (0.43). HIMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HIMDX (17 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HIMDX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HIMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMDX: NAESX (3000) vs HIMDX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. HIMDX (-6.92). HIMDX return over 5 years is better than : 115.15 vs. NAESX (69.32).
| HIMDX | NAESX | HIMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.336 | 1.432 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 3000 | 8,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.92 | 12.22 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.09 | 37.83 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.15 | 69.32 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.73 | 108.83 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement