Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HILAX vs TRIGX
HILAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HILAX vs TRIGX
Hartford International Value A
Price$24.65
Change+$0.18 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.28B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$24.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
HILAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HILAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HILAX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. HILAX (12.3B). HILAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HILAX (2.89) vs TRIGX (2.65). HILAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HILAX (16 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HILAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HILAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HILAX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.94 vs. HILAX (45.38). HILAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.03 vs. TRIGX (92.60).
| HILAX | TRIGX | HILAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.794 | 4.163 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 17.1B | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.65 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.38 | 50.94 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.58 | 79.65 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.03 | 92.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.67 | 155.12 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers