Advertisement
HIHO vs NNBR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIHO is a Buy and NNBR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIHO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- HIHO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIHO’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIHO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NNBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HIHO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -1.16% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+3.24% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| HIHO | NNBR | HIHO / NNBR | |
| Capitalization | 7.53M | 233M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -606K | 13.5M | -4% |
| Gain YTD | -12.308 | -40.367 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.35M | 489M | 2% |
| Total Cash | 5.24M | 21.9M | 24% |
| Total Debt | 984K | 206M | 0% |
HIHO | NNBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HIHO's Valuation (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNBR (92) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew significantly faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
HIHO's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NNBR (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
HIHO's SMR Rating (93) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NNBR (97) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
HIHO's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NNBR (86) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew similarly to NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
HIHO's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNBR (97) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNBR’s over the last 12 months.
| HIHO | NNBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
HIHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HIHO and MLI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIHO and MLI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIHO | 100% | N/A | ||
| MLI - HIHO | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ATI - HIHO | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
| TG - HIHO | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
| NNBR - HIHO | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IIIN - HIHO | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NNBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and CODI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and CODI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNBR | 100% | N/A | ||
| CODI - NNBR | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| WOR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| ESAB - NNBR | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| TG - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
| PRLB - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.95% | ||
More | ||||