HIG
Price
$135.30
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.74B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAFT
Price
$78.53
Change
+$0.27 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIG vs SAFT

Header iconHIG vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts HIG vs SAFTBanner chart's image
The Hartford Insurance Group
Price$135.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$1.5M
Capitalization37.74B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$78.53
Change+$0.27 (+0.35%)
Volume$93.64K
Capitalization1.17B
HIG vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIG vs. SAFT commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIG is a Buy and SAFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HIG: $135.29 vs. SAFT: $78.26)
Brand notoriety: HIG and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIG: 149% vs. SAFT: 111%
Market capitalization -- HIG: $37.74B vs. SAFT: $1.17B
HIG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $37.74B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $137.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

HIG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIG is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.59% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($37.7B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.17B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than HIG: SAFT (13.38) vs HIG (11.07). HIG YTD gains are higher at: 25.203 vs. SAFT (-1.600). HIG has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. SAFT (658M). SAFT has less debt than HIG: SAFT (42.6M) vs HIG (4.37B). HIG has higher revenues than SAFT: HIG (27.7B) vs SAFT (1.22B).
HIGSAFTHIG / SAFT
Capitalization37.7B1.17B3,222%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.203-1.600-1,575%
P/E Ratio11.0713.3883%
Revenue27.7B1.22B2,265%
Total Cash21.9B658M3,328%
Total Debt4.37B42.6M10,258%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIG vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
HIG
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
356
SMR RATING
1..100
9169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4672
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIG (62) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIG’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (56) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (91) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (72) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIGSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMAT26.320.28
+1.06%
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
BASG26.410.08
+0.32%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
KCCA16.700.04
+0.24%
KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF
EAGG47.970.02
+0.04%
iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
XVV53.190.02
+0.03%
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF

HIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIG has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIG jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIG
1D Price
Change %
HIG100%
+3.88%
TRV - HIG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
L - HIG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
CNA - HIG
83%
Closely correlated
+2.86%
CINF - HIG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
ALL - HIG
82%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+1.95%
CNA - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
+2.86%
HIG - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
THG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
CINF - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
L - SAFT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
More