Advertisement
HIG vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIG is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
HIG is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.06% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| HIG | SAFT | HIG / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 36.8B | 1.13B | 3,260% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.260 | -2.708 | 157% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.80 | 12.91 | 84% |
| Revenue | 27.7B | 1.22B | 2,265% |
| Total Cash | 21.9B | 658M | 3,328% |
| Total Debt | 4.37B | 42.6M | 10,258% |
HIG | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIG (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIG’s over the last 12 months.
HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (72) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (91) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.
HIG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
HIG's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| HIG | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 59% | 8 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 11 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSMIX | 45.89 | 0.22 | +0.48% |
| Columbia Small Cap Value Discv A | |||
| GWEIX | 34.85 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| AMG GW&K Small Cap Core I | |||
| GSIOX | 32.63 | 0.09 | +0.28% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Instl | |||
| FMAMX | 91.09 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel A | |||
| CYPSX | 63.28 | -1.55 | -2.39% |
| ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Svc | |||
HIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIG has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIG jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| THG - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| HIG - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||