HIFS
Price
$328.03
Change
+$11.94 (+3.78%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
688.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TYFG
Price
$48.00
Change
-$0.50 (-1.03%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
118.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIFS vs TYFG

Header iconHIFS vs TYFG Comparison
Open Charts HIFS vs TYFGBanner chart's image
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$328.03
Change+$11.94 (+3.78%)
Volume$503
Capitalization688.76M
Tri County Financial Group
Price$48.00
Change-$0.50 (-1.03%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization118.99M
HIFS vs TYFG Comparison Chart in %
HIFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIFS vs. TYFG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIFS is a Buy and TYFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (HIFS: $316.09 vs. TYFG: $50.10)
Brand notoriety: HIFS and TYFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIFS: 65% vs. TYFG: 98%
Market capitalization -- HIFS: $688.76M vs. TYFG: $118.99M
HIFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $688.76M. TYFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TYFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYFG is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TYFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIFS is a better buy in the short-term than TYFG.

Price Growth

HIFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.11% price change this week, while TYFG (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIFS($689M) has a higher market cap than TYFG($119M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than TYFG: HIFS (15.36) vs TYFG (8.74). HIFS YTD gains are higher at: 11.863 vs. TYFG (2.685). TYFG has less debt than HIFS: TYFG (132M) vs HIFS (1.53B). HIFS has higher revenues than TYFG: HIFS (91.6M) vs TYFG (58.3M).
HIFSTYFGHIFS / TYFG
Capitalization689M119M579%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.8632.685442%
P/E Ratio15.368.74176%
Revenue91.6M58.3M157%
Total Cash6.81MN/A-
Total Debt1.53B132M1,156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIFS vs TYFG: Fundamental Ratings
HIFS
TYFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1390
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7225
SMR RATING
1..100
5063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8665
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TYFG's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (68) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TYFG’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TYFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TYFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's SMR Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TYFG (63) in the null industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to TYFG’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TYFG (51) in the null industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to TYFG’s over the last 12 months.

TYFG's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as HIFS (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TYFG’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIFSTYFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
21%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEQCX5.72-0.03
-0.52%
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Instl
CMGYX29.59-0.17
-0.57%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I3
IVCSX15.17-0.09
-0.59%
Voya Small Company Port I
PFGRX30.11-0.73
-2.37%
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R
PSTAX18.83-0.61
-3.14%
Virtus KAR Capital Growth A

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+3.98%
MBWM - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FMBH - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
IBCP - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STBA - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
MCBS - HIFS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More

TYFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYFG and KPCPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYFG and KPCPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYFG
1D Price
Change %
TYFG100%
N/A
KPCPF - TYFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNC - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
MTB - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
HIFS - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
USCB - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More