HI
Price
$22.13
Change
+$0.30 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
16 days until earnings call
LASE
Price
$3.04
Change
-$0.03 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.55M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HI vs LASE

Header iconHI vs LASE Comparison
Open Charts HI vs LASEBanner chart's image
Hillenbrand
Price$22.13
Change+$0.30 (+1.37%)
Volume$305.31K
Capitalization3.53B
Laser Photonics
Price$3.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.98%)
Volume$211.57K
Capitalization11.55M
HI vs LASE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LASE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HI vs. LASE commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HI is a StrongBuy and LASE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HI: $22.13 vs. LASE: $3.04)
Brand notoriety: HI and LASE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HI: 64% vs. LASE: 76%
Market capitalization -- HI: $3.53B vs. LASE: $11.55M
HI [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $3.53B. LASE’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $11.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLASE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LASE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HI is a better buy in the long-term than LASE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LASE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LASE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HI is a better buy in the short-term than LASE.

Price Growth

HI (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while LASE (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

HI is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

LASE is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.10% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HI($3.53B) has a higher market cap than LASE($11.6M). HI has higher P/E ratio than LASE: HI (34.82) vs LASE (23.20). HI YTD gains are higher at: -26.632 vs. LASE (-47.405). HI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 437M vs. LASE (-3.97M). HI has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. LASE (8.31M). LASE has less debt than HI: LASE (588K) vs HI (2.13B). HI has higher revenues than LASE: HI (2.94B) vs LASE (4.61M).
HILASEHI / LASE
Capitalization3.53B11.6M30,414%
EBITDA437M-3.97M-11,002%
Gain YTD-26.632-47.40556%
P/E Ratio34.8223.20150%
Revenue2.94B4.61M63,875%
Total Cash198M8.31M2,382%
Total Debt2.13B588K362,925%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HI: Fundamental Ratings
HI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HILASE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LASE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKAIX52.990.60
+1.15%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap IS
PYVLX16.980.08
+0.47%
Payden Equity Income
SUPAX20.080.06
+0.30%
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class A
PEIYX37.680.10
+0.27%
Putnam Large Cap Value Y
REIGX16.71N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Growth R6

HI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HI has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HI jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HI
1D Price
Change %
HI100%
+1.37%
HLIO - HI
71%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
KAI - HI
69%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
LECO - HI
69%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
NPO - HI
68%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
TKR - HI
68%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More

LASE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LASE and SSHPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LASE and SSHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LASE
1D Price
Change %
LASE100%
-0.98%
SSHPF - LASE
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCTTU - LASE
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HI - LASE
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
QIND - LASE
22%
Poorly correlated
+13.05%
GRNWF - LASE
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.32%
More