It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HHEGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HHEGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HHEGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JZ (@Information Technology Services) price change was -7.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.99%.
‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Information Technology Services (-2.02% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
HHEGF | JZ | HHEGF / JZ | |
Capitalization | 30.3M | 1.1M | 2,747% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -94.995 | -83.625 | 114% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
HHEGF | JZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago35% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago38% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HHEGF and APEI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HHEGF and APEI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HHEGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HHEGF | 100% | N/A | ||
APEI - HHEGF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JZ - HHEGF | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
RTO - HHEGF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
GSUN - HHEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
DCMDF - HHEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JZ has been loosely correlated with INTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JZ jumps, then INTO could also see price increases.