Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHCZX vs HMEAX
HHCZX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCZX vs. HMEAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCZX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HHCZX (96.4M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: HMEAX (4.78) vs HHCZX (0.49). HHCZX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: HHCZX (18 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HMEAX (406.00) and HHCZX (397.00) have comparable annual turnover. HHCZX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. HMEAX (6.07). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.86 vs. HHCZX (-1.16).
| HHCZX | HMEAX | HHCZX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 2.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.07 | 2.74 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.831 | 5.229 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.4M | 1.17B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 4.78 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 6.07 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.12 | 15.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.16 | 16.86 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement