Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHCAX vs HMEAX
HHCAX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCAX vs. HMEAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCAX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HHCAX (96.4M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than HHCAX: HMEAX (4.78) vs HHCAX (0.21). HHCAX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: HHCAX (18 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HMEAX (406.00) and HHCAX (397.00) have comparable annual turnover. HHCAX (6%) and HMEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. HHCAX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. HMEAX (6.07). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.86 vs. HHCAX (-2.86).
| HHCAX | HMEAX | HHCAX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.73 | 2.49 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 2.74 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.462 | 5.229 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.4M | 1.17B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 4.78 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 6.07 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.82 | 15.97 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.86 | 16.86 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement