Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLFX
Hartford Global Impact R4
Price$16.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$80.54
Change+$0.57 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Buy and RSLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXSX (321M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: RSLFX (0.81) vs HGXSX (0.69). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: HGXSX (9 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). HGXSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. HGXSX (4.09). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.81 vs. RSLFX (3.92).
| HGXSX | RSLFX | HGXSX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.70 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.091 | 13.811 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 6.96 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 31.86 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 3.92 | 429% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement