Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLBX
HGXSX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact R4
Price$17.71
Change+$0.29 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.46M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
HGXSX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXSX (339M). HGXSX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXSX (0.30) vs RSLBX (0.19). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXSX (9 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than HGXSX (1.16). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXSX (36.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLBX (250). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. HGXSX (10.07). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 13.14 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| HGXSX | RSLBX | HGXSX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.74 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.542 | 4.706 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.19 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 11.64 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.01 | 20.82 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.14 | -12.64 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers