Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLDX
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$74.76
Change-$0.18 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLDX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a StrongBuy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. HGXIX (310M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: HGXIX (0.90) vs RSLDX (0.81). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). HGXIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. RSLDX (10.50). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.20 vs. RSLDX (16.53).
| HGXIX | RSLDX | HGXIX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.573 | 9.831 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 10.50 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.12 | 22.36 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.20 | 16.53 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers