Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.70
Change+$0.27 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.46M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXIX (339M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.52) vs RSLBX (0.19). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXIX (36.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. HGXIX (10.32). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.47 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.74 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.74 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 4.706 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.19 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 11.64 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.99 | 20.82 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.47 | -12.64 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers