Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.25
Change+$0.45 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (321M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSLBX (0.05). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. HGXIX (4.32). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.84 vs. RSLBX (-3.26).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.298 | 12.726 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.05 | 1,623% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 5.86 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.03 | 28.13 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.84 | -3.26 | -546% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers