Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.88M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (326M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSLBX (0.05). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. RSLBX (7.70). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.54 vs. RSLBX (-10.47).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.74 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.74 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.858 | 9.287 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.05 | 1,623% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 7.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.86 | 31.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.54 | -10.47 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers