Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSEBX
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.48
Change+$0.52 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (321M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSEBX (0.22). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. HGXIX (4.32). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.84 vs. RSEBX (-0.44).
| HGXIX | RSEBX | HGXIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.298 | 13.034 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.22 | 404% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 6.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.03 | 29.27 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.84 | -0.44 | -4,037% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers