Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSEBX
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.88
Change+$0.69 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. HGXIX (323M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXIX (0.87) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. RSEBX (11.87). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.02 vs. RSEBX (15.07).
| HGXIX | RSEBX | HGXIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.524 | 11.388 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.23 | 383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | 11.87 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.93 | 35.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.02 | 15.07 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement