Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXFX vs SFCWX
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$16.71
Change-$0.25 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.93M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.93
Change-$1.39 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. SFCWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. HGXFX (319M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: HGXFX (1.07) vs SFCWX (0.90). HGXFX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXFX (9 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). HGXFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXFX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. HGXFX (7.17). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.21 vs. SFCWX (9.26).
| HGXFX | SFCWX | HGXFX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.489 | 12.305 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 81.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.17 | 7.88 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.03 | 32.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.21 | 9.26 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers