Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSLCX
HGXCX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSLCX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
Price$69.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXCX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSLCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXCX (326M). RSLCX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSLCX (0.38) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSLCX (24 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSLCX (1.30). RSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSLCX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). RSLCX (8.32) and HGXCX (8.04) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. RSLCX (-7.50).
| HGXCX | RSLCX | HGXCX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.30 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.30 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.632 | 9.904 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 8.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 33.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | -7.50 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers