Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSLAX
HGXCX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSLAX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$62.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXCX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSLAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXCX (326M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSLAX (0.10) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSLAX (1.74). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSLAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. RSLAX (7.64). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. RSLAX (-10.50).
| HGXCX | RSLAX | HGXCX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.74 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.74 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.632 | 9.213 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 7.64 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 31.69 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | -10.50 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers