Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$17.09
Change+$0.29 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.46M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.91
Change+$1.51 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXCX (339M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.34) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXCX (36.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.65 vs. HGXCX (9.20). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.51 vs. RSEBX (-9.71).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.494 | 4.733 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 12.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.87 | 22.63 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.51 | -9.71 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers