Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.88M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.75
Change+$0.27 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXCX (324M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. RSEBX (5.34). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.64 vs. RSEBX (13.62).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.237 | 10.373 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 5.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 43.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.64 | 13.62 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement