Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.58
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXCX (326M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.22) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. HGXCX (8.04). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. RSEBX (-7.61).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.632 | 10.112 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 8.51 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 33.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | -7.61 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers