Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.85M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. HGXCX (327M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. RSEBX (5.94). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.08 vs. RSEBX (5.76).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.438 | 10.450 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 5.94 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.47 | 39.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.08 | 5.76 | 435% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers