Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs SCWFX
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs SCWFX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$17.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.88M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXAX (326M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: HGXAX (0.61) vs SCWFX (0.52). HGXAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXAX (9 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). HGXAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). SCWFX (9.05) and HGXAX (8.77) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.95 vs. SCWFX (-5.83).
| HGXAX | SCWFX | HGXAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 10.328 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.52 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.77 | 9.05 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.02 | 34.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | -5.83 | -222% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers