Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs SCWFX
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs SCWFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$75.47
Change+$1.46 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXAX (340M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: SCWFX (0.64) vs HGXAX (0.22). HGXAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXAX (9 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). HGXAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXAX (36.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. HGXAX (9.95). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.72 vs. SCWFX (-7.76).
| HGXAX | SCWFX | HGXAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.526 | 4.761 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.64 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 13.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.69 | 24.14 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.72 | -7.76 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement