Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSLCX
HGXAX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSLCX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$17.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
Price$68.13
Change+$0.39 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
HGXAX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSLCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and RSLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. HGXAX (297M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: HGXAX (0.61) vs RSLCX (0.40). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSLCX (23 years). RSLCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLCX (32.00). RSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSLCX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.99 vs. RSLCX (10.07). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.78 vs. RSLCX (19.16).
| HGXAX | RSLCX | HGXAX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.30 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.30 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.809 | 8.440 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.40 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.99 | 10.07 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.12 | 33.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.78 | 19.16 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers