Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.91
Change+$1.51 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXAX (340M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: RSEBX (0.34) vs HGXAX (0.22). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXAX (36.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.65 vs. HGXAX (9.95). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.72 vs. RSEBX (-9.71).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.526 | 4.733 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 12.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.69 | 22.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.72 | -9.71 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement