Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGOCX vs RGEBX
HGOCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGOCX vs RGEBX
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$65.98
Change-$0.12 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.79B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
HGOCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGOCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGOCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HGOCX (6.79B). HGOCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HGOCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HGOCX (24 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: RGEBX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.18 vs. RGEBX (10.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. HGOCX (-41.69).
| HGOCX | RGEBX | HGOCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.09 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.09 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.717 | 17.511 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.79B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.18 | 10.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 122.01 | 69.56 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.69 | 36.57 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.49 | 92.27 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement