HGMCF
Price
$15.20
Change
+$0.14 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.16B
IMPUF
Price
$7.20
Change
-$0.20 (-2.70%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGMCF vs IMPUF

Header iconHGMCF vs IMPUF Comparison
Open Charts HGMCF vs IMPUFBanner chart's image
Harmony Gold Mining
Price$15.20
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.16B
Impala Platinum Holdings
Price$7.20
Change-$0.20 (-2.70%)
Volume$14.4K
Capitalization6.32B
HGMCF vs IMPUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGMCF vs. IMPUF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGMCF is a Hold and IMPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HGMCF: $15.06 vs. IMPUF: $7.95)
Brand notoriety: HGMCF and IMPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGMCF: 30% vs. IMPUF: 62%
Market capitalization -- HGMCF: $5.16B vs. IMPUF: $6.32B
HGMCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.16B. IMPUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGMCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIMPUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HGMCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IMPUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the long-term than IMPUF.

Price Growth

HGMCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while IMPUF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMPUF($6.32B) has a higher market cap than HGMCF($5.16B). HGMCF has higher P/E ratio than IMPUF: HGMCF (10.56) vs IMPUF (3.52). HGMCF YTD gains are higher at: 82.104 vs. IMPUF (54.100). IMPUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 52.2B vs. HGMCF (12.8B). IMPUF has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. HGMCF (3.44B). IMPUF has less debt than HGMCF: IMPUF (1.18B) vs HGMCF (3.36B). IMPUF has higher revenues than HGMCF: IMPUF (121B) vs HGMCF (57.4B).
HGMCFIMPUFHGMCF / IMPUF
Capitalization5.16B6.32B82%
EBITDA12.8B52.2B25%
Gain YTD82.10454.100152%
P/E Ratio10.563.52300%
Revenue57.4B121B47%
Total Cash3.44B28.1B12%
Total Debt3.36B1.18B285%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGMCF vs IMPUF: Fundamental Ratings
HGMCF
IMPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
980
SMR RATING
1..100
3694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2470
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMPUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as HGMCF (16). This means that IMPUF’s stock grew similarly to HGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IMPUF (80). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than IMPUF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMPUF (94). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMPUF’s over the last 12 months.

IMPUF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HGMCF (40). This means that IMPUF’s stock grew similarly to HGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMPUF (70). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

HGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGMCF and BXXRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGMCF and BXXRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGMCF
1D Price
Change %
HGMCF100%
N/A
BXXRF - HGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMNGF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ALDVF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPUY - HGMCF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
IMPUF - HGMCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IMPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMPUF and IMPUY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMPUF and IMPUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMPUF
1D Price
Change %
IMPUF100%
N/A
IMPUY - IMPUF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
RIOFF - IMPUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
CCHI - IMPUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - IMPUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INCAF - IMPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More