HGMCF
Price
$13.22
Change
+$0.47 (+3.68%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
8.81B
HVGDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGMCF vs HVGDF

Header iconHGMCF vs HVGDF Comparison
Open Charts HGMCF vs HVGDFBanner chart's image
Harmony Gold Mining
Price$13.22
Change+$0.47 (+3.68%)
Volume$195
Capitalization8.81B
Harvest Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.5K
Capitalization5.45M
HGMCF vs HVGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGMCF vs. HVGDF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGMCF is a StrongBuy and HVGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HGMCF: $13.23 vs. HVGDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: HGMCF and HVGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGMCF: 101% vs. HVGDF: 104%
Market capitalization -- HGMCF: $8.81B vs. HVGDF: $5.45M
HGMCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.81B. HVGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGMCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHVGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HGMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HVGDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the short-term than HVGDF.

Price Growth

HGMCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.08% price change this week, while HVGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4896.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGMCF($8.81B) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($5.45M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 225.000 vs. HGMCF (59.915). HGMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20B vs. HVGDF (-401.82K). HGMCF has more cash in the bank: 9.4B vs. HVGDF (190K). HGMCF has higher revenues than HVGDF: HGMCF (67.1B) vs HVGDF (0).
HGMCFHVGDFHGMCF / HVGDF
Capitalization8.81B5.45M161,608%
EBITDA20B-401.82K-4,977,415%
Gain YTD59.915225.00027%
P/E Ratio10.19N/A-
Revenue67.1B0-
Total Cash9.4B190K4,945,263%
Total Debt2.11BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGMCF vs HVGDF: Fundamental Ratings
HGMCF
HVGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
3696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGMCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (70). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVGDF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (96). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HGMCF (56). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to HGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGMCFHVGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLX3.130.09
+2.96%
BingEx Ltd.
SPG179.860.99
+0.55%
Simon Property Group
ADGM1.63N/A
-0.30%
Adagio Medical Holdings Inc.
DJT16.97-0.11
-0.64%
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp
LUNR8.46-0.25
-2.87%
Intuitive Machines

HGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGMCF and ALDVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGMCF and ALDVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGMCF
1D Price
Change %
HGMCF100%
N/A
ALDVF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEGCF - HGMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
HVGDF - HGMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+7.79%

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+7.79%
IEGCF - HVGDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
HGMCF - HVGDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A