Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGICX vs RWMFX
HGICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGICX vs RWMFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
HGICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGICX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. HGICX (11.3B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGICX: RWMFX (1.45) vs HGICX (0.00). HGICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGICX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGICX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGICX: RWMFX (250) vs HGICX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. HGICX (-0.63). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. HGICX (23.83).
| HGICX | RWMFX | HGICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.31 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.31 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.046 | 1.520 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 208B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 5.51 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.52 | 30.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.83 | 37.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.88 | 98.02 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement