Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs SHSAX
HGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.46B vs. HGHCX (786M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHCX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). HGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHCX (2000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.81 vs. HGHCX (-17.57). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.30 vs. HGHCX (-28.15).
| HGHCX | SHSAX | HGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.09 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.09 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.544 | -0.817 | 679% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 786M | 6.46B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.57 | -11.81 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.13 | -7.36 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.15 | -8.30 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.49 | 10.50 | -367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers