Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs PRHSX
HGHCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. HGHCX (738M). PRHSX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: PRHSX (0.01) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: HGHCX (25 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). PRHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.40 vs. HGHCX (40.00). HGHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: HGHCX (2000) vs PRHSX (2500). PRHSX (-20.51) and HGHCX (-21.02) have marching annual gain over last year. PRHSX return over 5 years is better than : -12.52 vs. HGHCX (-28.49).
| HGHCX | PRHSX | HGHCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.539 | -0.038 | 9,383% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 738M | 10.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.02 | -20.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.76 | -4.45 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.49 | -12.52 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.77 | 15.11 | -177% |