Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs JNGLX
HGHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 5.39B vs. HGHCX (853M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: JNGLX (0.28) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: HGHCX (26 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). HGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JNGLX (30.00). HGHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: HGHCX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. HGHCX (7.76). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.30 vs. HGHCX (-15.72).
| HGHCX | JNGLX | HGHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.552 | 20.686 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 853M | 5.39B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 18.50 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.73 | 23.82 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.72 | 17.30 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.60 | 61.51 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement