Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHAX vs SHSAX
HGHAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.54B vs. HGHAX (845M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: SHSAX (0.20) vs HGHAX (0.16). HGHAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHAX (26 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. HGHAX (40.00). HGHAX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.99 vs. SHSAX (-0.62). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -4.14 vs. SHSAX (-9.01).
| HGHAX | SHSAX | HGHAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.402 | 3.059 | 340% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 6.54B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | -0.62 | -970% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | -3.36 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | -9.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.97 | 38.59 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement