HGHAF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
48.84M
NSFDF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGHAF vs NSFDF

Header iconHGHAF vs NSFDF Comparison
Open Charts HGHAF vs NSFDFBanner chart's image
HIGH ARCTIC ENERGY SVCS INC NEW
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization48.84M
NXT Energy Solutions
Price$0.44
Change-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Volume$5.13K
Capitalization15.82M
HGHAF vs NSFDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGHAF vs. NSFDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAF is a Buy and NSFDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HGHAF: $0.62 vs. NSFDF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: HGHAF and NSFDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGHAF: 141% vs. NSFDF: 16%
Market capitalization -- HGHAF: $48.84M vs. NSFDF: $15.82M
HGHAF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $48.84M. NSFDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $15.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGHAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSFDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HGHAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGHAF is a better buy in the long-term than NSFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGHAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSFDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGHAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSFDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSFDF is a better buy in the short-term than HGHAF.

Price Growth

HGHAF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NSFDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.17% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGHAF($48.8M) has a higher market cap than NSFDF($15.8M). NSFDF YTD gains are higher at: 301.155 vs. HGHAF (-20.513). NSFDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.69M vs. HGHAF (-9.77M). HGHAF has more cash in the bank: 46.7M vs. NSFDF (468K). NSFDF has less debt than HGHAF: NSFDF (1.97M) vs HGHAF (5.51M). HGHAF has higher revenues than NSFDF: HGHAF (60.8M) vs NSFDF (0).
HGHAFNSFDFHGHAF / NSFDF
Capitalization48.8M15.8M309%
EBITDA-9.77M-4.69M208%
Gain YTD-20.513301.155-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue60.8M0-
Total Cash46.7M468K9,979%
Total Debt5.51M1.97M279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGHAF vs NSFDF: Fundamental Ratings
HGHAF
NSFDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
2482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NSFDF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGHAF (98). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as HGHAF (100). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSFDF (82). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HGHAF (64). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSFDF (92). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGHAFNSFDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTNOY8.080.08
+1.00%
MTN Group Ltd.
IWTNF10.50N/A
N/A
IWATANI CORP.
VTDRF12.00N/A
N/A
Vantage Drilling International Ltd
FNMAJ12.65N/A
N/A
Fannie Mae
GWLL0.20N/A
N/A
GOLDENWELL BIOTECH INC.

HGHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGHAF and PDER have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGHAF and PDER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGHAF
1D Price
Change %
HGHAF100%
N/A
PDER - HGHAF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKRYY - HGHAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNTIF - HGHAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATONY - HGHAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTNR - HGHAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NSFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSFDF and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSFDF and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSFDF
1D Price
Change %
NSFDF100%
-6.88%
PLSDF - NSFDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+6.59%
PSYTF - NSFDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
HGHAF - NSFDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - NSFDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - NSFDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More