HGHAF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.92M
HNTIF
Price
$4.47
Change
-$0.13 (-2.83%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
709.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGHAF vs HNTIF

Header iconHGHAF vs HNTIF Comparison
Open Charts HGHAF vs HNTIFBanner chart's image
HIGH ARCTIC ENERGY SVCS INC NEW
Price$0.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization7.92M
Hunting Group
Price$4.47
Change-$0.13 (-2.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization709.12M
HGHAF vs HNTIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNTIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGHAF vs. HNTIF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAF is a StrongBuy and HNTIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HGHAF: $0.63 vs. HNTIF: $4.47)
Brand notoriety: HGHAF and HNTIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGHAF: 33% vs. HNTIF: 9%
Market capitalization -- HGHAF: $7.92M vs. HNTIF: $709.12M
HGHAF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $7.92M. HNTIF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $709.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGHAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHNTIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HGHAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HNTIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNTIF is a better buy in the long-term than HGHAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGHAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNTIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGHAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HNTIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGHAF is a better buy in the short-term than HNTIF.

Price Growth

HGHAF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while HNTIF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNTIF($709M) has a higher market cap than HGHAF($7.92M). HNTIF YTD gains are higher at: 24.328 vs. HGHAF (-19.103). HNTIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.4M vs. HGHAF (1.65M). HNTIF has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. HGHAF (2.43M). HGHAF has less debt than HNTIF: HGHAF (4.52M) vs HNTIF (136M). HNTIF has higher revenues than HGHAF: HNTIF (1.08B) vs HGHAF (9.68M).
HGHAFHNTIFHGHAF / HNTIF
Capitalization7.92M709M1%
EBITDA1.65M7.4M22%
Gain YTD-19.10324.328-79%
P/E RatioN/A4.92-
Revenue9.68M1.08B1%
Total Cash2.43M180M1%
Total Debt4.52M136M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGHAF vs HNTIF: Fundamental Ratings
HGHAF
HNTIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
1794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
160
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNTIF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGHAF (99). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew significantly faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HNTIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGHAF (100). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HNTIF (94). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew significantly faster than HNTIF’s over the last 12 months.

HNTIF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HGHAF (63). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew similarly to HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNTIF (60). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNTIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGHAFHNTIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNTIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRTVX307.073.06
+1.01%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index I
RTDYX17.240.12
+0.71%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity Y
GFVIX15.900.10
+0.63%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Inv
MLACX4.840.01
+0.21%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class C
TIOHX17.070.02
+0.12%
Nuveen International Opps I

HGHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGHAF and PDER have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGHAF and PDER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGHAF
1D Price
Change %
HGHAF100%
+0.16%
PDER - HGHAF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKRYY - HGHAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNTIF - HGHAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATONY - HGHAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTNR - HGHAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HNTIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNTIF and TAGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNTIF and TAGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNTIF
1D Price
Change %
HNTIF100%
N/A
TAGP - HNTIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - HNTIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - HNTIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CESDF - HNTIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PDER - HNTIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More