Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$14.67
Change+$1.40 (+10.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.11B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. HFYYX (3.11B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.88) vs TRIGX (2.47). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYYX (0.86) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. HFYYX (47.86). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.32 vs. HFYYX (79.15).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.81 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.81 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.186 | 8.284 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 17.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.47 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.86 | 50.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.79 | 85.64 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.15 | 101.32 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 163.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement