Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$13.08
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.56
Change+$0.18 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HFYYX (2.52B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.51) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYYX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). HFYYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.13 vs. TRIGX (24.97). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. HFYYX (83.71).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.111 | 31.725 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 16.2B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.96 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.13 | 24.97 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.14 | 89.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.71 | 100.87 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement