Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYTX vs TRIGX
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYTX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
Price$13.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.76B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.64
Change+$0.15 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.73B
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. HFYTX (2.76B). HFYTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYTX (2.29) vs TRIGX (1.85). HFYTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYTX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYTX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.64 vs. TRIGX (35.30). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 84.07 vs. HFYTX (76.03).
| HFYTX | TRIGX | HFYTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.420 | 38.258 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76B | 16.7B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 1.85 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.64 | 35.30 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.58 | 75.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.03 | 84.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement