Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRWTX
HFYSX vs TRWTX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRWTX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$14.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97B
Transamerica International Equity I3
Price$26.02
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
HFYSX vs TRWTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRWTX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Hold and TRWTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRWTX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. HFYSX (2.97B). TRWTX pays higher dividends than HFYSX: TRWTX (3.84) vs HFYSX (2.79). HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRWTX: HFYSX (9 years) vs TRWTX (33 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRWTX (0.76). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRWTX (12.00). HFYSX (0) and TRWTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.90 vs. TRWTX (33.43). HFYSX return over 5 years is better than : 69.18 vs. TRWTX (48.65).
| HFYSX | TRWTX | HFYSX / TRWTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.76 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.76 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.471 | 3.377 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97B | 4.44B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 3.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.90 | 33.43 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.94 | 48.03 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.18 | 48.65 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement