Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TROZX
HFYSX vs TROZX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TROZX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$14.65
Change+$1.39 (+10.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq Z
Price$25.59
Change+$2.83 (+12.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
HFYSX vs TROZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TROZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Hold and TROZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TROZX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. HFYSX (3.14B). TROZX pays higher dividends than HFYSX: TROZX (3.08) vs HFYSX (2.63). HFYSX was incepted earlier than TROZX: HFYSX (9 years) vs TROZX (6 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TROZX (0.65). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TROZX (15.90). HFYSX (0) and TROZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TROZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.63 vs. HFYSX (47.35). TROZX return over 5 years is better than : 110.11 vs. HFYSX (76.35).
| HFYSX | TROZX | HFYSX / TROZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.65 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.198 | 8.340 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 17.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.35 | 51.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.17 | 90.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 110.11 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement