Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$14.65
Change+$1.39 (+10.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. HFYSX (3.14B). HFYSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYSX (2.63) vs TRIGX (2.47). HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. HFYSX (47.35). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.32 vs. HFYSX (76.35).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.81 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.81 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.198 | 8.284 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 17.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.47 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.35 | 50.40 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.17 | 85.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 101.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 163.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement