Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$13.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.84B
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFYSX (2.72B). HFYSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYSX (2.08) vs TRIGX (1.90). HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYSX (39.34) and TRIGX (38.57) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.02 vs. HFYSX (84.03).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.153 | 39.612 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 16.8B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.90 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.34 | 38.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.78 | 84.72 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.03 | 98.02 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement